August 2017

The National Communications and Commission prescribed the Rules for Evaluating Cable Radio and Television Business Plans on November 4, 2016(Taiwan)

2016.11.04
Oli Wong

The National Communications and Commission (hereinafter, the "NCC") promulgated the Rules for Evaluating Cable Radio and Television Business Plans via the Tong-Chuan-Ping-Tai-10541037550 Directive of November 4, 2016 (hereinafter, the "Rules"), which came into effect on the day of their promulgation. The Rules are highlighted below:

I. Evaluation and Examination Items
Article 2 of the Rules provides that a system operator is required to submit an evaluation report and relevant supporting materials to the central competent authority within six months after its business license has been issued for three years and six years. The central competent authority will conduct its evaluation and examination based on five categories, namely, channels, finance, customer service, organization and engineering.

II. Procedure and Manners of Evaluation and Examination
1. The Rules specifically provide that the central competent authority shall conduct on-site inspection according to a system operator's evaluation report in conjunction with governments of municipalities under the direct jurisdiction of the central government and of counties (cities).
2. The first stage written examination and scoring: The advisors shall set up an evaluation task force to conduct the first stage written examination and scoring based on channels, finance, customer service, organization and engineering. Meanwhile, the local government of a municipality under the direct jurisdiction of the central government or of a county (city) where the system operator is located will provide general comments and assign scores under five categories, namely, channels, finance, customer service, organization and engineering with the results provided to the Cable Radio and Television Evaluation Consultation Conference (hereinafter, the "Consultation Conference") as a scoring item (Article 6).
3. The second stage review: The Consultation Conference will conduct the second stage review based on the scoring tables, general comments, recommended grades and relevant materials from the evaluation task force and the government of a municipality under the direct jurisdiction of the central government or of a county (city) where the system operator under evaluation is located (Articles 5 and 7).

III. Recommendations and Results of Evaluation
1. The Consultation Conference shall make evaluation recommendations such as "excellence," "passing," "improvement within a specified period," and "revocation of the license" based on the total evaluation score and the score for each category. The Consultation Conference shall refer the evaluation recommendations, meeting minutes and consultation opinions in the preceding paragraph to the central competent authority for evaluation reference (Article 8).
2. The central competent authority will reach evaluation conclusions such as "excellence," "passing," "improvement within a specified period" and "revocation of the license" in reference to the evaluation recommendations of such Consultation Conference in the preceding paragraph (Article 9).

IV. Delivery of the Recommendations and Results of Evaluation and Rectification by the System Operator
Communication of evaluation results and improvement comments to system operators under evaluation shall be delivered to the system operator under evaluation by the central competent authority.
The system operators under evaluation are required to rectify based on the evaluation results and improvement comments and to report the status of rectification. (Article 9).

本網站上所有資料內容(「內容」)均屬理慈國際科技法律事務所所有。本所保留所有權利,除非獲得本所事前許可外,均不得以任何形式或以任何方式重製、下載、散布、發行或移轉本網站上之內容。

所有內容僅供作參考且非為特定議題或具體個案之法律或專業建議。所有內容未必為最新法律及法規之發展,本所及其編輯群不保證內容之正確性,並明示聲明不須對任何人就信賴使用本網站上全部或部分之內容,而據此所為或經許可而為或略而未為之結果負擔任何及全部之責任。撰稿作者之觀點不代表本所之立場。如有任何建議或疑義,請與本所聯繫。

作者

Katty
Katty