August 2017

Unlawful infringement upon a company's trade secrets with economic values means the company has sustained a loss of comparable property value according to general social concepts(Taiwan)

2016.08.31
Sean Liu

The Supreme Court rendered the 105-Tai-Shang-1501 Civil Decision of August 31, 2016 (hereinafter, the "Decision"), holding that unlawful infringement upon a company's trade secrets with economic values means the company has sustained a loss of comparable property value according to general social concepts.

According to the facts underlying this Decision, the Appellant is a company that develops and produces tire pressure monitoring system (hereinafter, the "TPMS"). The Appellees had previously been the Appellant's employees who successively left and set up a company to operate the same TPMS business that the Appellant has been operating. After the Appellant filed a complaint, it was found as a result of the police's search that the Appellant's important trade secrets such as customer information, documents managed by the Appellant's research and development department, ISO documents and tables and forms were in the possession of the company separately set up by such individuals. Therefore, the Appellant filed a complaint for its losses from trade secret infringement and sought damages in the amount of NT$3 million, which shall be jointly and severally assumed by the Appellees.

According to the Decision, the company's trade secrets at issue had economic values and the company indeed could sustain a loss of comparable property value if they are unlawfully infringed according to general social concepts. Since the original decision which contained unfavorable findings on the ground that the Appellant could not substantiate its losses was certainly unlawful, the original decision was reversed and remanded.

本網站上所有資料內容(「內容」)均屬理慈國際科技法律事務所所有。本所保留所有權利,除非獲得本所事前許可外,均不得以任何形式或以任何方式重製、下載、散布、發行或移轉本網站上之內容。

所有內容僅供作參考且非為特定議題或具體個案之法律或專業建議。所有內容未必為最新法律及法規之發展,本所及其編輯群不保證內容之正確性,並明示聲明不須對任何人就信賴使用本網站上全部或部分之內容,而據此所為或經許可而為或略而未為之結果負擔任何及全部之責任。撰稿作者之觀點不代表本所之立場。如有任何建議或疑義,請與本所聯繫。

作者

Katty
Katty