August 2017

The Rules for Anti-money Laundering for Financial Institutions were prescribed to confirm the identity of customers and retention of records in consolidated manners(Taiwan)

2017.6.28
Oli Wong

The Financial Supervisory Commission promulgated the Rules for Anti-money Laundering for Financial Institutions (hereinafter, the "Rules"), which consist of 16 articles, via the Jin-Guan-Yin-Fa-10610003100 Directive of June 28, 2017. The Rules came into effect on the day of their promulgation.

Under the first part of Article 7, Paragraph 4 of the Money Laundering Control Law, the central competent authority for specified business shall prescribe rules for authorizing matters such as the confirmation of a customer's identity, retention of records, enhanced customer review, reporting of currency transactions above a certain monetary threshold and reporting of any transaction suspected to be involved in money laundering or terrorist funding. Therefore, the Rules are formulated to require financial institutions to implement an identity confirmation procedure upon account opening of customers, including the requirement to request the submission of identification supporting documents to identify and verify their identity and to ascertain the purposes and nature of account opening (such as potential transactions via the account) and background information.

The Rules apply to banks, securities and futures operators, insurers, electronic payment institutions, and electronic ticket issuers regulated by the Financial Supervisory Commission. (Article 2 of the Rules)

With respect to the decision on the intensity of enforcement, a financial institution is required to decide on different intensity of enforcement, depending on the level of risk. If assessment suggests higher risks, more information should be obtained from customers and appropriate control measures should be adopted. For customers from countries or regions where money laundering or terrorist funding risks are high, enhanced measures comparable to risks should also be taken. (Article 6, Paragraph 1 of the Rules)

With respect to scope of scrutiny, a financial institution shall scrutinize if a customer is an individual holding an important political position inside or outside this country or in any international organization or a designated sanction target. In addition, the scope of scrutiny should extend to actual beneficiaries and high-ranking executives of juristic person or organization customers. (Article 8, Subparagraph 1 and Article 10, Paragraph 1 of the Rules)

The Rules also specifically stipulate that if a financial institution finds that a customer uses a false name or false account or holds any forged or altered document, refuses to provide identity verification documents, or the information so provided is unclear when verifying the identity of the customer, the business relationship or transaction should be declined politely. (Article 4 of the Rules)

本网站上所有资料内容(「内容」)均属理慈国际科技法律事务所所有。本所保留所有权利,除非获得本所事前许可外,均不得以任何形式或以任何方式重制、下载、散布、发行或移转本网站上之内容。

所有内容仅供作参考且非为特定议题或具体个案之法律或专业建议。所有内容未必为最新法律及法规之发展,本所及其编辑群不保证内容之正确性,并明示声明不须对任何人就信赖使用本网站上全部或部分之内容,而据此所为或经许可而为或略而未为之结果负担任何及全部之责任。撰稿作者之观点不代表本所之立场。如有任何建议或疑义,请与本所联系。

作者

Katty
Katty