August 2026
The Supreme People's Court Releases Analysis of the People's Court Daily's Top Ten Cases of 2025 (Part I) (Mainland China)
The Supreme People's Court (SPC) has released the People's Court Daily's Top Ten Cases of 2025, covering a broad range of legal areas, including criminal law, civil law, labor protection, and the protection of minors. The selected cases include, among others, China's first case recognizing the eligibility of a child conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF) to receive work-related death benefits, the widely discussed "engagement rape" case, and a landmark case concerning the restoration of an individual's credit record. These cases not only address issues of significant public concern but also reflect the evolving judicial philosophy in the new era. As such, they provide important guidance for judicial practice and serve as noteworthy examples in advancing the rule of law in China.
I. China's First Case Recognizing an IVF-Conceived Child's Entitlement to Work-Related Death Benefits: Safeguarding Rights in the Era of Reproductive Technology
In this case, the court, for the first time, recognized that an eligible child conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF) is entitled to the statutory benefits and survivor compensation available to the close relatives of an employee who dies as a result of a work-related injury. The judgment departs from the traditional approach to determining family relationships by extending legal protection to new forms of kinship arising from advances in assisted reproductive technology.
The significance of this case is reflected in several key aspects. First, it reinforces the principle of the best interests of the child. Regardless of the manner of conception or birth, every child is entitled to equal legal status and protection. The court's decision fully embodies the principle that the interests of children should be accorded paramount consideration. Second, it demonstrates that legal interpretation should evolve alongside scientific and technological developments. While the law is intended to provide stability and certainty, society continues to evolve. Faced with novel legal issues arising from emerging reproductive technologies, the judiciary has adapted legal interpretation in a manner that ensures the law remains responsive to contemporary social realities. Third, it reflects a people-centered and humanitarian approach to justice. Rather than focusing solely on the formal legal definition of family relationships, the court also considered the genuine emotional bonds and practical interests shared among family members. The decision therefore illustrates a judicial philosophy that balances legal certainty with fairness, compassion, and the realities of modern family life.
II. The "Engagement Rape" Case: Reaffirming That Sexual Autonomy Cannot Be Waived
The "engagement rape" case has been one of the most widely debated judicial cases in recent years. Influenced by traditional social perceptions, some members of the public believed that an engagement relationship implied a certain degree of consent to sexual relations. The court, however, made it clear that an engagement does not constitute implied consent to sexual activity. Any sexual act committed against a woman's will may constitute the criminal offence of rape, regardless of the parties' relationship status.
The significance of the case is reflected in several respects. First, it reaffirms the central role of the principle of consent. Modern criminal law protects an individual's sexual autonomy rather than any particular personal or family relationship. Even where the parties are engaged, in a romantic relationship, or legally married, such a relationship does not confer upon one party the right to control or dispose of the other person's body. Second, the judgment promotes the evolution of public understanding of gender equality and personal autonomy. For many years, certain traditional social attitudes have tended to diminish the importance of a woman's freely expressed wishes. Through this judgment, the court has sent a clear message that no intimate relationship can justify the infringement of another person's bodily autonomy. The decision further reinforces the legal principle that human dignity deserves the highest level of protection. By placing the individual's free will at the center of its legal analysis, the court demonstrates a strong commitment to safeguarding personality rights, bodily integrity, and personal liberty. The significance of this case extends well beyond the dispute itself. It represents an important judicial effort to promote public awareness of gender equality, strengthen respect for sexual autonomy, and enhance the rule of law in contemporary Chinese society.
III. Ningbo Branch and Gulou Sub-branch of a specific bank v. Hainan Industrial Company, Ningbo Import & Export Company, et al.: Enforcement of Financial Loan Contract Judgments
This case arose from the enforcement of an effective judgment in a financial loan contract dispute. The primary objective of the enforcement proceedings was to implement the legally effective judgment by taking lawful enforcement measures to realize the judgment creditor's claims while simultaneously safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the judgment debtors.
During enforcement proceedings, the People's Court typically conducts investigations into the judgment debtor's assets, including bank deposits, real property, equity interests, motor vehicles, and other assets. Depending on the circumstances of the case, the court may adopt various enforcement measures, such as asset inquiries, freezing of accounts, compulsory transfers of funds, seizure of property, judicial auction, or judicial sale of assets. Where multiple judgment debtors are involved, or where joint and several liability has been established, the court will determine the scope of each party's liability in accordance with the law so as to enhance enforcement efficiency and ensure that the proceedings are conducted in an orderly and lawful manner. For financial institutions, applying for compulsory enforcement is an important legal mechanism for protecting financial claims and mitigating financial risks. This case demonstrates the People's Court's commitment to the principles of lawful, standardized, and prudent civil enforcement. While ensuring the effective realization of financial creditors' lawful rights, the court also took into account the continued operation of the enterprises involved, seeking to minimize unnecessary adverse effects on the legitimate rights and interests of the relevant parties. The case provides valuable guidance for the enforcement of complex commercial matters involving the disposal of significant corporate assets and the balancing of competing stakeholder interests. It further illustrates the judiciary's efforts to achieve an appropriate balance among legal effectiveness, social impact, and economic efficiency in enforcement proceedings.
Taken together, these three representative cases demonstrate the evolving priorities of China's rule of law. They reflect a judicial philosophy that places the protection of the people's legitimate rights and interests at its core, responds proactively to legal challenges arising from emerging technologies and new forms of economic activity, and places greater emphasis on the protection of personality rights and the delivery of justice with a human-centered approach. More broadly, these cases illustrate the People's Court's continuing efforts to promote the modernization of social governance through the rule of law.
I. China's First Case Recognizing an IVF-Conceived Child's Entitlement to Work-Related Death Benefits: Safeguarding Rights in the Era of Reproductive Technology
In this case, the court, for the first time, recognized that an eligible child conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF) is entitled to the statutory benefits and survivor compensation available to the close relatives of an employee who dies as a result of a work-related injury. The judgment departs from the traditional approach to determining family relationships by extending legal protection to new forms of kinship arising from advances in assisted reproductive technology.
The significance of this case is reflected in several key aspects. First, it reinforces the principle of the best interests of the child. Regardless of the manner of conception or birth, every child is entitled to equal legal status and protection. The court's decision fully embodies the principle that the interests of children should be accorded paramount consideration. Second, it demonstrates that legal interpretation should evolve alongside scientific and technological developments. While the law is intended to provide stability and certainty, society continues to evolve. Faced with novel legal issues arising from emerging reproductive technologies, the judiciary has adapted legal interpretation in a manner that ensures the law remains responsive to contemporary social realities. Third, it reflects a people-centered and humanitarian approach to justice. Rather than focusing solely on the formal legal definition of family relationships, the court also considered the genuine emotional bonds and practical interests shared among family members. The decision therefore illustrates a judicial philosophy that balances legal certainty with fairness, compassion, and the realities of modern family life.
II. The "Engagement Rape" Case: Reaffirming That Sexual Autonomy Cannot Be Waived
The "engagement rape" case has been one of the most widely debated judicial cases in recent years. Influenced by traditional social perceptions, some members of the public believed that an engagement relationship implied a certain degree of consent to sexual relations. The court, however, made it clear that an engagement does not constitute implied consent to sexual activity. Any sexual act committed against a woman's will may constitute the criminal offence of rape, regardless of the parties' relationship status.
The significance of the case is reflected in several respects. First, it reaffirms the central role of the principle of consent. Modern criminal law protects an individual's sexual autonomy rather than any particular personal or family relationship. Even where the parties are engaged, in a romantic relationship, or legally married, such a relationship does not confer upon one party the right to control or dispose of the other person's body. Second, the judgment promotes the evolution of public understanding of gender equality and personal autonomy. For many years, certain traditional social attitudes have tended to diminish the importance of a woman's freely expressed wishes. Through this judgment, the court has sent a clear message that no intimate relationship can justify the infringement of another person's bodily autonomy. The decision further reinforces the legal principle that human dignity deserves the highest level of protection. By placing the individual's free will at the center of its legal analysis, the court demonstrates a strong commitment to safeguarding personality rights, bodily integrity, and personal liberty. The significance of this case extends well beyond the dispute itself. It represents an important judicial effort to promote public awareness of gender equality, strengthen respect for sexual autonomy, and enhance the rule of law in contemporary Chinese society.
III. Ningbo Branch and Gulou Sub-branch of a specific bank v. Hainan Industrial Company, Ningbo Import & Export Company, et al.: Enforcement of Financial Loan Contract Judgments
This case arose from the enforcement of an effective judgment in a financial loan contract dispute. The primary objective of the enforcement proceedings was to implement the legally effective judgment by taking lawful enforcement measures to realize the judgment creditor's claims while simultaneously safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the judgment debtors.
During enforcement proceedings, the People's Court typically conducts investigations into the judgment debtor's assets, including bank deposits, real property, equity interests, motor vehicles, and other assets. Depending on the circumstances of the case, the court may adopt various enforcement measures, such as asset inquiries, freezing of accounts, compulsory transfers of funds, seizure of property, judicial auction, or judicial sale of assets. Where multiple judgment debtors are involved, or where joint and several liability has been established, the court will determine the scope of each party's liability in accordance with the law so as to enhance enforcement efficiency and ensure that the proceedings are conducted in an orderly and lawful manner. For financial institutions, applying for compulsory enforcement is an important legal mechanism for protecting financial claims and mitigating financial risks. This case demonstrates the People's Court's commitment to the principles of lawful, standardized, and prudent civil enforcement. While ensuring the effective realization of financial creditors' lawful rights, the court also took into account the continued operation of the enterprises involved, seeking to minimize unnecessary adverse effects on the legitimate rights and interests of the relevant parties. The case provides valuable guidance for the enforcement of complex commercial matters involving the disposal of significant corporate assets and the balancing of competing stakeholder interests. It further illustrates the judiciary's efforts to achieve an appropriate balance among legal effectiveness, social impact, and economic efficiency in enforcement proceedings.
Taken together, these three representative cases demonstrate the evolving priorities of China's rule of law. They reflect a judicial philosophy that places the protection of the people's legitimate rights and interests at its core, responds proactively to legal challenges arising from emerging technologies and new forms of economic activity, and places greater emphasis on the protection of personality rights and the delivery of justice with a human-centered approach. More broadly, these cases illustrate the People's Court's continuing efforts to promote the modernization of social governance through the rule of law.
The contents of all newsletters of Shanghai Lee, Tsai & Partners (Content) available on the webpage belong to and remain with Shanghai Lee, Tsai & Partners. All rights are reserved by Shanghai Lee, Tsai & Partners, and the Content may not be reproduced, downloaded, disseminated, published, or transferred in any form or by any means, except with the prior permission of Shanghai Lee, Tsai & Partners.
The Content is for informational purposes only and is not offered as legal or professional advice on any particular issue or case. The Content may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. Shanghai Lee, Tsai & Partners and the editors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The contributing authors' opinions do not represent the position of Shanghai Lee, Tsai & Partners. If the reader has any suggestions or questions, please do not hesitate to contact Shanghai Lee, Tsai & Partners.
