May 2020

Reply of the Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate on Whether a Person on Probation Should be Deemed Recidvist When Committing an Offense Punishable by an Imprisonment Sentence within Five Years after the Expiration of the Probation Period (Mainland China)

Di Wu

On January 17, 2020, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate issued the Reply on Whether a Person on Probation Should be Deemed Recidvist After Committing an Offense Punishable by an Imprisonment Sentence within Five Years after the Expiration of the Probation Period (the "Reply") in response to inquiries on the subject from the higher people's courts and people's procuratorates of certain provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the jurisdiction of the State Council.

Under Article 65 of the Criminal Law, an offender who commits another offense punishable by imprisonment within five years after having fully served another prison sentence shall be deemed as recidivist and is subject to greater punishment, except for cases of negligence and crimes committed by persons under 18 years of age.  The Reply holds that for criminals who commits an offense punishable by a prison sentence within five years of the end of the probation period after they had a previous offense punishable by a prison sentence commuted to probation, as the prison sentence for the previous offense was never actually implemented, the requirement that "the sentence has been carried out" under Article 65 of the Criminal Law has not been met, thus they shall not be deemed as recidivist.  However, there is discretion in considering such as an aggravating circumstance in determining the sentence for the new crime.

The contents of all materials (Content) available on the website belong to and remain with Lee, Tsai & Partners.  All rights are reserved by Lee, Tsai & Partners, and the Content may not be reproduced, downloaded, disseminated, published, or transferred in any form or by any means, except with the prior permission of Lee, Tsai & Partners.  The Content is for informational purposes only and is not offered as legal or professional advice on any particular issue or case.  The Content may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments.

Lee, Tsai & Partners and the editors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The contributing authors’ opinions do not represent the position of Lee, Tsai & Partners. If the reader has any suggestions or questions, please do not hesitate to contact Lee, Tsai & Partners.

作者