August 2017

The Fair Trade Commission prescribed the Standard for Applying Article 64 of the Fair Trade Law(Taiwan)

2016.08.04
Sean Liu

The Fair Trade Commission promulgated the Standard for Applying Article 46 of the Fair Trade Law (hereinafter, the "Standard") via the Gong-Fa-10515605372 Directive of August 4, 2016. Consisting of six articles, the Standard came into effect immediately.

Article 46 of the Fair Trade Law provides: "The Law has precedence over other laws with regards to the governance of any enterpriseÕs conduct in respect of competition, provided that this shall not apply if other laws contain relevant provisions that do not conflict with the legislative purposes of this Law." Therefore, Article 1 of the Standard specifically stipulates the principles applicable to this article.

Article 2 of the Standard provides that Article 46 of the Fair Trade Law applies only when an enterprise's competitive conduct is prohibited by the Fair Trade Law but is conducted pursuant to other laws, regulations or directives. Conversely, Article 46 does not apply if an enterprise's conduct in respect to competition is not prohibited by the Fair Trade Law or is prohibited both by the Fair Trade Law and other laws. However, the Fair Trade Commission may negotiate a solution with other agencies.

Article 3 of the Standard provides that the Fair Trade Law is a basic economic law. If an enterprise's conduction in respect of competition is prohibited by the law but is conducted pursuant to other laws, regulations or directives, this law should basically have precedence, and other laws, regulations or directives may have precedence only when they do not contradict the legislative purposes of the Fair Trade Law. Article 4 of the Standard specifically provides that the legislative purposes of the Fair Trade Law are to safeguard trading order and consumer interest, ensure free and fair competition an promote economic stability and prosperity.

Article 5 of the Standard provides that to determine if the interpretation and implementation of other laws, regulations or directives contradict the legislatives purposes of the law, the following factors shall be generally considered: (1) the enactment (formulation), amendment and implementation of other laws, regulations or directives; and (2) means of competition, scope of the market for individual cases, number and market performance of competitors, market concentration, market entry barrier, economic efficiency, consumer interest, transaction costs, etc. The Standard also points out certain common practical examples, such as industries of natural monopoly. Since market competition can no longer be harnessed to guide the most efficient allocation of resources for industries of natural monopoly, it can be determined that price control exercised pursuant to other laws does not contradict the legislative purposes of this law.

本網站上所有資料內容(「內容」)均屬理慈國際科技法律事務所所有。本所保留所有權利,除非獲得本所事前許可外,均不得以任何形式或以任何方式重製、下載、散布、發行或移轉本網站上之內容。

所有內容僅供作參考且非為特定議題或具體個案之法律或專業建議。所有內容未必為最新法律及法規之發展,本所及其編輯群不保證內容之正確性,並明示聲明不須對任何人就信賴使用本網站上全部或部分之內容,而據此所為或經許可而為或略而未為之結果負擔任何及全部之責任。撰稿作者之觀點不代表本所之立場。如有任何建議或疑義,請與本所聯繫。

作者

Katty
Katty